Differences Between Bureaucrats And Aristocrats In Government :: essays research papers

Bureaucrats and aristocrats, the former evident in the organization in the piquantness dynasty (617-907) and the ladder pronoun in the government of Heian Japan. Both are different in many different aspects, such as within government, government structure, law, economy, and society.A bureaucrat can be defined by the following an appointed government authorised with certain duties and responsibilities defined by disposition in the bureaucracy. A bureaucrat is more dependent on the government than an aristocrat because official power comes from official appointment through the bureaucracy (Class Lecture, Oct. 16, 97). Bureaucracy number 1 replaced aristocracy in the thunder dynasty, under the rule of Empress Wu (625?-706?, r.690-706) bureaucracy was spread out by furthering expansion policies and supporting the examination system. Positions in government were modify through the examination system, and people who passed were called the literati. When one held this title of lite rati, you were considered intelligent and were considered to bear high status (TA session, Oct. 28, 97). "They were a group of smart guys with a faithful education." (Steve, TA session, Oct. 28, 97). This of course deprived the hereditary aristocracy of power they had enjoyed during the expiration of division, when appointments had been made by recommendation, and opened government service to a sensibly wider class of people... (Schirokauer, p.103). For the first time, men who entered office through examination could fall the highest office, fifty-fifty that of Chief Minister. Examination graduates earned (earn being the operative word) prestige, and even though officials still entered government by other means such as family connections, at the same time the literati and thus the bureaucrats were gaining authority, jurisdiction, and power. And thus, one could insure this shifting of supremacy from the aristocracy to the bureaucracy.Government in the Tang dynasty was regulated by the Tang legal codes, a system of laws written by legalists which consisted of a system of rewards and severe punishments (TA session, Oct. 28, 97). These legal codes were administrative reporting what the state could do and what the subjects could not do. This is an important point in that, this showed the subjects possessed little power, the Tang legal codes are the opposite of any laws of present day, these legal codes saved the government and not the people. Government needed the subjects only to provide for taxes (revenue), jab (grain) and military (soldiers) reasons. A dead subject was not as useful as a living subject.